Side Event at UN Climate Conference in Cancún

Venue
Cancún, Mexico
Date
Verantwortlicher Ansprechpartner bei RADOST
Grit Martinez
RADOST-Referent
Grit Martinez
Teilnehmer
Grit Martinez
Protokollverantwortlicher
Grit Martinez

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bSimilarly to climate summits in previous years, the 16th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which took place in November/December 2010 in Cancún, Mexico, was attended by a great number of civil society observers. This extensive representation made the negotiations develop into a global meeting place for the exchange of ideas on all issues concerning climate change.
The Ecologic Institute (Germany), the Helmholtz Center Geesthacht (HZG, Germany), the Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (Netherlands) and the United Nations Human Settlements programme convened a side-event on Stakeholder-Based Approaches to Climate Change Adaptation in Coastal Region and Cities. The workshop was framed by the project RADOST (Regional Adaptation Strategies for the German Baltic Sea Coast) which especially engages in the transfer of information and know-how of regional adaptation measures in Germany and other coastal regions of the world.
The workshop took place in the Green Forum located in the Climate Change Village and was accessible by delegates and observers as well as the general public.  The Participants included delegates from Austria, Germany and Bangladesh as well as representatives from governmental and non-governmental organizations from North and South America, Europe, Africa and Asia.
As climate change impacts become felt worldwide, adaptation efforts will become necessary in a number of contexts, including agriculture, security, water resources management, coastal zones, marine and terrestrial ecosystems, human settlements, cities and human health. So far, the focus of adaptation activities has rested on vulnerability assessments and planning. While the need to move ahead with implementation is widely recognized, adaptation efforts have to account for regional and local stakeholder needs and address potential economic and social risks and opportunities. But beyond the general imperative to foster broad stakeholder participation, there is little guidance on what this entails. Moreover, the issues under consideration are characterized by complexity, uncertainty and misperceptions on adaptation practices. This is associated with the risk of distorted adaptation strategies and investments and the overall effectiveness of adaptation implementations.
Against this background the workshop aimed to share knowledge and experience in particular on the following issues:

  • The global adaptation policies and the formation of a new global adaptation alliance;
  • The perceptions of regional and local stakeholders climate change adaptation, the scientific discourse and its implications on adaptation activities;
  • The regional and local needs as a precondition for stakeholder involvements and actions;
  • The inclusion of stakeholders in the decision making process and adaptation planning;
  • Various approaches, methodologies and tools to incorporate stakeholders’ objectives in designing climate change adaptation either on regional or local (city) level;
  • The exchange of best practices and implementation projects;
  • Methods on adaptation actions assessment and prioritization;
  • What constitutes good adaptation practices and how to avoid maladaptive pursuance;
  • Raising awareness and countering common misperceptions of adaptation.
    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-qformat:yes;
    mso-style-parent:"";
    mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0cm;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
    mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;
    mso-fareast-language:EN-GB;}

 Main outcomes of the discussions:

  • The importance of the creation of informal platforms for dialogue upon which participants could exchange information on adaptation measures, views and experiences and explore opportunities for further collaboration; references were made to data information systems such as the Nairobi work programme;
  • The need for considerable work on the matter of science communication and the production of useable knowledge which can be absorbed by local decision makers and regional communities;
  • The establishment of projects which are sitting at the nexus of development and climate change and which are driven by community needs;
  • Climate proofing and corruption proofing of adaptation strategies and measures must go hand in hand;
  • Those affected should be involved in the dialogue and  their views and objectives should be taken into account during the decision making process to  promote no regret adaptation strategies and investment decisions based on integrity and equity principles;
  • The importance of stakeholders’ inclusion at the local level in climate change adaptation planning for reaching more defensible and acceptable adaptation policy decisions;
  • The necessity and importance of enhancing and enriching current decision support tools for adaptation planning by incorporating participatory elements next to analytical ones;
  • The moral obligation of industrialized countries (regions and cities) to share adaptation knowledge and capacities with  developing and least developed countries (regions and cities);
  • The usefulness of exchanging adaptation strategies between industrialized countries, the formulation of regional networks across national borders and the promotion of transnational knowledge transfers.
    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-qformat:yes;
    mso-style-parent:"";
    mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0cm;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
    mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;
    mso-fareast-language:EN-GB;}

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;
mso-fareast-language:EN-The Ecologic Institute is a member of the Nairobi work programme which is undertaken under the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice of the UNFCCC. Its objective is to assist all Parties, in particular developing countries to improve their understanding and assessment of impacts, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change and to make informed decisions on practical adaptation actions and measures.
An action data base of the activities within the Nairobi work programme can be found here.